Legal Opinion

John Ryan v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 18, 2000No. 98-1736PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge.

Custis v. United States, 511 U.S. 485, 487, 114 S.Ct. 1732, 128 L.Ed.2d 517 (1994), considered “whether a defendant in a federal sentencing proceeding may collaterally attack the validity of previous state convictions that are used to enhance his sentence” and held that “a defendant has no such right (with the sole exception of convictions obtained in violation of the right to counsel)”. We must decide whether Custis means only that the time for the attack on the state conviction is postponed to a collateral attack on the federal sentence. Our answer is no. A…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Brown v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Richard Dale Talbott, Applicant v. State of IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  2. Bernard Hawkins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  3. Robin L. Peoples v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  4. State v. HahnWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  5. United States v. Charles StokesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API