Legal Opinion
Oladeinde v. City of Birmingham
District Court, N.D. Alabama
Decided April 22, 1999No. 2:91-cr-00196PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ACKER, District Judge.
After unprecedented travail and travel, this case may be in its final stages. The court may now have before it the most vexing issue it has faced since 1991 when the case began, namely, the possible indemnification of judgment debtors, Arthur Deutcsh (“Deutcsh”) and Julius Walker (“Walker”), by City of Birmingham (“City”). A finding of indemnity will require payment by City of the judgments against Deutcsh and Walker in favor of plaintiffs, Valinda F. Oladeinde (“Olad-einde”) and Patricia Fields (“Fields”). This post-judgment issue is properly before…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Smith v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Charlotte I. Gamble, Etc., Etc. v. The Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- Argento v. Village of Melrose ParkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Franklin v. City of HuntsvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
- MacEy v. CrumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brannan & Guy, PC v. City of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
- Johnson v. City of PrichardDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2011
- Ayers v. City of ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- Ayers v. City of ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 2017