Commonwealth v. Mauz
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
STABILE, J.:
Appellant, Gary Alan Mauz, appeals from the trial court’s June 20, 2014 judgment of sentence imposing a $50 fine and court costs. After careful review, we vacate the judgment of sentence.
Police cited Appellant on April 25, 2013 for disorderly conduct (using obscene language and creating a hazardous or physically offensive condition 1 ) based on an encounter between Appellant and his neighbor, Victoria Battistini (“Battistini”) the previous day. The trial court summarized the pertinent facts:
At the de novo trial, [Battistini], testified that on April 24, 2013, at…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Commonwealth v. RahmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Commonwealth v. FedorekSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Commonwealth v. MaerzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Com. v. McConnell, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- Commonwealth v. PennixSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Com. v. Fisher, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
- Com. v. McConnell, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- Com. v. Blackburn, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.