Adventist Healthcare v. Mattingly
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
Adventist Healthcare, Inc., et al. v. Susan M. Mattingly, No. 2104, Sept. Term 2018. Opinion filed on January 29, 2020, by Berger, J. SPOLIATION The lawful cremation of a family member’s remains is not an “act of destruction” in the spoliation context, nor did a mother’s decision to cremate her son’s remains evince an intent to destroy evidence. When an individual who has authority to make decisions about the appropriate disposition of a decedent’s remains chooses to obtain a private autopsy and subsequently have the remains cremated, the person with authority has no duty to preserve evidence…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Rodriguez v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Stabb v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- Klupt v. KrongardCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Giant Food, Inc. v. BookerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- State v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2019
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Koskovich v. Scottsdale HealthcareCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2021
- Michelle Stovern, as personal representative of the estate of Ashton Clark Gillming Stovern v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company, and John Does 1-5District Court, D. Montana · 2025
- Olson v. A.R.T. Institute of Washington, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2025
- Samuel Hernandez and Zusmitha Arnesto v. City Hospital, Inc. d/b/a WVU Medicine/Berkeley Medical CenterIntermediate Court of Appeals of West Virginia · 2026