Legal Opinion
Noblitt v. METROPOLITAN PLAN COMM., ETC.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided February 21, 1961No. 19,163PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAx, C. J.
The controversy involved in this appeal arose out of a varinance originally granted by the Marion County Board of Zoning Appeals to Florence E. Dawson and Emily S. Maxwell, owners of two lots, together with the Sun Oil Company, an interested party, to permit the construction of a Sunoco Service Station in a residential district of Marion County, Indiana. The variance was later sustained by the Metropolitan Plan Commission of Marion County, Indiana, Board of Zoning Appeals. Thereafter the appellants (plaintiffs below) who are other property owners in the zoned area in which the variance was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Schumacher v. Adams Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1947
- KUPFER v. Board of Zoning AppealsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1959
- Bryant v. OwensIndiana Supreme Court · 1953
- McArdle v. BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS, ETC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1960
- Jones v. VantressIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- City of Evansville v. BYERSIndiana Court of Appeals · 1964
- Leventhal v. MichaelisNew York Supreme Court · 1961
- Minton v. State Ex Rel. CohenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- Noblitt v. Metropolitan Planning Com.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1963
- Zimmerman v. KramerNew York Supreme Court · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.