Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Ritter

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 15, 1948No. 47243PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHale, J.

The appellants, nephews and nieces, and the children of a deceased niece named in item four of the will, will hereafter be described as plaintiffs. The appellees, administrator with will annexed and the devisees of the remainder under item two, appear separately and will be named as defendants.

In order to present the question at issue we set out, as far as is necessary, all of the will of the decedent, M. W. Bitter, which was admitted to probate February 8, 1944. After the formal declaration the will is as follows:

“First: I direct that all my just debts, including the expenses of my last…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of LepleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
  2. Long v. NorthupSupreme Court of Iowa · 1938
  3. Wilts v. WiltsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  4. McAllister v. McAllisterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  5. In Re Estate of AustinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re Artz'EstateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
  2. In Re Estate of BarnesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
  3. Nolte v. NolteSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
  4. Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Sioux City v. Staab's EstateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
  5. Metzgar v. RodgersCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API