Legal Opinion
Dixon v. University of Toledo
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided July 31, 2009No. 3:08 CV 2806PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KATZ, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Crystal Dixon’s motion to amend the Amended Complaint and file a Second Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 25) which Defendants oppose (Doc. No. 28). This matter is also before the Court on Defendants’ motions to dismiss (Doc No. 12, 20) to which Plaintiff has filed oppositions (Doc. No. 19, 22) and Defendants have filed a reply (Doc. No. 23). The Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1343, and the Equal Pay Act (“EPA”).
Defendants consist of the University of Toledo (“University”); Lloyd Jacobs,…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Bassett v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Corning Glass Works v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Perkins v. Rock-Tenn Services, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2016
- Andrews v. Lecats Ventriloscope LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2022
- Sharkey v. Fortress Systems International, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2019