Legal Opinion

Kendzierski v. Kendzierski

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1940No. Docket No. 90, Calendar No. 40,973PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

Plaintiffs’ bill of complaint, while it seeks other relief, is fundamentally one for specific performance of an alleged oral agreement whereby, contingent upon performance on their part, plaintiffs upon the death of Mary Kendzierski were to become vested with title in fee to certain property formerly owned by her, she being the mother of plaintiff John Kendzierski. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the bill of complaint for the following reasons: 1. Because no cause of action entitling them to equitable relief is set forth in plaintiffs’ bill of complaint. 2. Because plaintiffs seek…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. King v. LuyckxMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Briggs v. BriggsMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Duncan v. DuncanMichigan Supreme Court · 1939

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McDonald v. ScheiflerMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Brummel v. BrummelMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Kendzierski v. KendzierskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Morten v. ZevalkinkMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Szarapski v. MacIukMichigan Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API