Legal Opinion

Sutera v. Natiello

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided May 7, 2019No. AC40749PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPellegrino, J.

This appeal arises from a substantial monetary judgment in favor of the plaintiff, Nathanial Sutera, who sustained serious injuries when he fell from scaffolding erected on the side of a three story building owned by the defendant Deborah Natiello. The defendants, Natiello and Timothy Sutera (Timothy S.), 1 appeal following the trial court's denial of their motion to set aside the verdict or for remittitur. On appeal, the defendants claim that (1) the trial court committed harmful error by giving a jury instruction on the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur, and (2) the jury verdict was improperly…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Curry v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  2. Suarez v. Dickmont Plastics Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  3. Giles v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  4. Munn v. Hotchkiss SchoolSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
  5. Fabrizio v. GlaserSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Garcia v. CohenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2020
  2. Sutera v. NatielloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API