Legal Opinion

Montezuma Grain Co. v. Surface Transportation Board

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided August 5, 2003No. 02-3960PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FLAUM, Chief Judge.

CSX Transportation, Inc., (“CSXT”) used to own and operate a 1.88-mile stretch of track near Montezuma, Indiana. After the Surface Transportation Board 1 authorized CSXT to abandon the track, the Montezuma Grain Company (“Montezuma Grain”) and the Redevelopment Commission of Parke County, Indiana, (“County”) moved to reopen the abandonment proceedings. The Board denied their motion, and Montezuma Grain and the County now petition us for review. The petition is denied.

I. Background

This case concerns two segments of a contiguous 1.88-mile stretch of track running west from…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Preseault v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Hayfield Northern Railroad v. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Janet Fritsch v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Monroe County, a Legal Subdivision of the State of Indiana, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
  4. Consolidated Rail Corporation v. Surface Transportation Board, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  5. Daryl Becker v. Surface Transportation Board and United States of America, T and P Railway, Inc. And American Trails Association, Inc., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Montezuma Grain Co., Llp, and Redevelopment Commission of Parke County, Indiana v. Surface Transportation Board and United States of America, and Csx Transportation, Inc., InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API