Legal Opinion

Philadelphia, to Use v. Stange

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 3, 1931No. Appeal, 327PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Frazer,

This action in assumpsit is to recover on a bond given by defendants to the City of Philadelphia to protect laborers and materialmen under a contract with defendant city. The pertinent facts follow: On June 22,1925, the Stange Construction Company entered into a written contract with the City of Philadelphia to grade Pattison Avenue from Tenth Street to Eleventh Street, Tenth Street from Bigler Street to Pattison Avenue and Eleventh Street from Pattison Avenue to Terminal Avenue. On the same day, the Stange Construction Company, as principal contractor,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Title Guaranty & Trust Co. of Scranton v. Crane Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. McCaffrey v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. Greene County v. Southern Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. Loughrey v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  5. Schlossstein Et Ux. v. BernsteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Medvidovich v. SchultzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Commonwealth v. A. Stryker, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Fleck-Atlantic Co. v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Philadelphia School District v. B. A. Shrages Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. Lancaster v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API