Samarzich v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.
Plaintiff brought this action to recover the compensation prescribed by the terms of an accident insurance policy. Trial was had before a jury. At the conclusion of plaintiff’s case, defendant ■challenged the legal sufficiency of the evidence, and moved the court for a judgment in its favor, as a matter of law. The court sustained the challenge, and rendered judgment for defendant. The plaintiff has appealed.
We will state briefly the facts upon which the litigation rests: E. A. Webster & Co., a copartnership, was engaged in construction work connected with the Kittitas High-Line reclamation…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Imperial Fire Insurance v. Coos CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Zappala v. Industrial Insurance CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Starr v. Aetna Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- Standard Life & Accident Ins. v. McNultyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- Green v. National Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Annabell M. Williamson, Administratrix of the Estate of Lee A. Williamson, Deceased v. Weyerhaeuser Timber Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Latimer v. Western MacHinery ExchangeWashington Supreme Court · 1952
- Calvin v. West Coast Power Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1942
- Krause v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1940
- Howard v. HollahanWashington Supreme Court · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.