Legal Opinion

Samarzich v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1935No. 25185. Department TwoPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover the compensation prescribed by the terms of an accident insurance policy. Trial was had before a jury. At the conclusion of plaintiff’s case, defendant ■challenged the legal sufficiency of the evidence, and moved the court for a judgment in its favor, as a matter of law. The court sustained the challenge, and rendered judgment for defendant. The plaintiff has appealed.

We will state briefly the facts upon which the litigation rests: E. A. Webster & Co., a copartnership, was engaged in construction work connected with the Kittitas High-Line reclamation…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Imperial Fire Insurance v. Coos CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Zappala v. Industrial Insurance CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Starr v. Aetna Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Standard Life & Accident Ins. v. McNultyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  5. Green v. National Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Annabell M. Williamson, Administratrix of the Estate of Lee A. Williamson, Deceased v. Weyerhaeuser Timber Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
  2. Latimer v. Western MacHinery ExchangeWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Calvin v. West Coast Power Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1942
  4. Krause v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Howard v. HollahanWashington Supreme Court · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API