Rivenburgh v. Viking Boat Co.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
On summary consideration, order reversed and a new trial granted with costs to abide the event. A plaintiff in a wrongful death action is not held to as high a degree of *852proof as a plaintiff in a personal injury action and is entitled to benefit from every favorable inference which can reasonably be drawn from the evidence in determining whether a prima facie case has been made out (see Noseworthy v City of New York, 298 NY 76). In this case, the testimony of the marine mechanic, Albert Sabiston, raised an issue as to the existence of a leak in the fuel tanks of decedent’s…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Noseworthy v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
3Cited by9 opinions
- Iannelli v. PowersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Gajjar v. ShahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Schafrick v. Shinnecock Bait & Tackle Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- German v. MoralesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Natale v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.