Legal Opinion

Rivenburgh v. Viking Boat Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 14, 1982PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

On summary consideration, order reversed and a new trial granted with costs to abide the event. A plaintiff in a wrongful death action is not held to as high a degree of *852proof as a plaintiff in a personal injury action and is entitled to benefit from every favorable inference which can reasonably be drawn from the evidence in determining whether a prima facie case has been made out (see Noseworthy v City of New York, 298 NY 76). In this case, the testimony of the marine mechanic, Albert Sabiston, raised an issue as to the existence of a leak in the fuel tanks of decedent’s…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Noseworthy v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1948

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Iannelli v. PowersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. Gajjar v. ShahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. Schafrick v. Shinnecock Bait & Tackle Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. German v. MoralesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  5. Natale v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API