Legal Opinion
In re Kirkpatrick
District Court, S.D. California
Decided November 24, 1936No. Nos. 26720-Y, 26721-YPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
YANKWICH, District Judge.
On October 18, 1935, the debtors, who are husband and wife, filed identical petitions for composition and extension under section 75 of the Bankruptcy Act, as amended (11 U.S.C.A. § 203). On April 17, 1936, while the petition was still pending, -the respondent, E. H. Hardt, filed with the conciliation commissioner a petition for dismissal of the petition and for leave to sell farming real property in San Bernardino county, Cal., on which he held a deed of trust, upon which default had been-made, both as to principal and interest, prior to the institution of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Isaacs v. Hobbs Tie & Timber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Straton v. NewSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Ex Parte BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Hiscock v. Varick Bank of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- In re Jersey Island Packing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1905
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re American Fidelity CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1939
- Hardt v. KirkpatrickCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937