Legal Opinion
Duke Laboratories, Inc. v. United States
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided July 1, 1963No. Civ. 9332PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TIMBERS, District Judge.
Defendant has made a timely motion, pursuant to Rule 50(b), Fed.R.Civ.P., to set aside the jury verdict in the form of answers to special questions and the judgment in favor of plaintiff entered thereon; for entry of judgment in favor of defendant in accordance with defendant’s motion for a directed verdict; or, in the alternative, for a new trial.
Plaintiff brought this action, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a) (1), to recover $478,040.71 of accumulated earnings taxes claimed to have been erroneously assessed and collected for the years 1956, 1957, 1958 and 1959.
After an…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. Elliott Kahaner, Antonio Corallo and James Vincent KeoghCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Dixie, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- The Smoot Sand & Gravel Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1957
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Floyd v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- John P. Scripps Newspapers v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1965
- Bremerton Sun Publishing Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1965
- J.H. Rutter Rex Mfg. Company, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- C. E. Hooper, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.