Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Taylor v. Wheeler

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided December 16, 2016No. 2150776Published

1ConcurrenceDonaldson, Judge

I concur. The Alabama Supreme Court has held that “[djenying, and to a more limited extent granting, a motion for new trial is within the sound discretion of the trial court.” Carter v. Henderson, 598 So.2d 1350, 1354 (Ala. 1992). When a motion for a new trial is based on the trial judge’s perception of the weight of the evidence and not on procedural or substantive errors or irregularities, the trial court’s discretion is. more limited, and, if such a motion is granted/ our greatest deference should be in favor of the jury’s verdict.

In Shows v. Jamison Bedding, Inc., 671 F.2d 927, 930 (5th…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dan Lind v. Schenley Industries IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
  2. Carter v. HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  3. Shows v. Jamison Bedding, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  4. Jawad v. GranadeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  5. Redd v. City of Phenix City, Ala.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API