Legal Opinion

Edwards v. Dickson

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1886No. Case No. 2058PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Appeal from Titus. Tried below before the Hon. W. H. Baldwin, Special Judge. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

Gaines, Associate Justice.

This suit was brought by appellant to recover of appellee, Dickson, as sheriff, and the other appellees, as sureties on his official bond, damages for the seizure of a stock of drugs by Dickson under an execution against one W. H. Blythe. Appellees pleaded a general denial, and, for special answers, set up that the sale of the goods from Blythe to appellant was fraudulent and void as to creditors of Blythe, and, also, that by reason of certain representations made by appellant, he is estopped to assert his claim to the property.

The first error assigned by appellant,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Dickerson v. ColgroveSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Insurance Co. v. MowrySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. P. J. Willis & Bro. v. McNeillTexas Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railroad v. Le GierseTexas Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Faxton v. FaxonMichigan Supreme Court · 1873

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Neal v. PickettTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  2. Booty v. O'ConnorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  3. Lisa Kramer, F/K/A Lisa Kastleman v. Bryan KastlemanTexas Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Dallas Consolidated Electric Street Railway Co. v. McAllisterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905
  5. Longbotham v. LeyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API