Legal Opinion

Horn v. Horn

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 2, 1989No. 431PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

OLSZEWSKI, Judge:

This is an appeal from the denial of a request for reduction of spousal support. The background of this case is somewhat convoluted. The court of common pleas entered an order requiring appellant to pay appellee $700 per month in spousal support. Subsequently, appellant and appellee became entangled in divorce litigation, filed separately at a different term of court. 1 The divorce litigation was bifurcated, and the judge in that action ordered “that the Order of Support entered at No. 1104 of 1984, D.R. 36349 shall continue as Alimony Pendente Lite.” 2

Appellant…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Remick v. RemickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Wolk v. WolkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. White v. WhiteSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Prozzoly v. ProzzolySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Ritter v. RitterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Purdue v. PurdueSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Bowser v. Bowser, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Crawford County1993
  3. Gabriel v. Gabriel, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lawrence County2014
  4. Musko v. MuskoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Musko v. MuskoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API