Legal Opinion · Dissent

New York Life Ins. Co. v. Wilson

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 22, 1949No. 12227_1Published

1Dissent

POPE, Circuit Judge.

I dissent. In my opinion the majority have completely disregarded the controlling Idaho decision and have ignored the clear and unequivocal language of the policy.

The exclusion clause, quoted at length in the majority opinion, provided that: “Double indemnity shall not be payable if the insured’s death resulted * * * directly or indirectly, from infirmity of mind or body, from illness or disease, or from any bacterial infection * * * ” etc.

The facts of the case as we must deal with them, are those disclosed by plaintiff’s own witnesses, — those most favorable to her. The…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Silverstein v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Browning v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc.Utah Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Evans v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Browning v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc.Utah Supreme Court · 1938
  5. First Nat. Bank v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API