Legal Opinion
The Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad Company, a Corporation v. The United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided June 7, 1963No. 425-57PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, Judge.
Plaintiff is one of a large number of railroads which banded together in the late 1940’s to buy the Pullman sleeping car business. As a result of a Government antitrust suit, Pullman, Inc., the parent company of the Pullman interests, was required in 1944 to divest itself of either its car manufacturing business or its sleeping car activities. It chose to retain the former and therefore approached various railroads to purchase the assets or stock of The Pullman Company, the subsidiary which operated the sleeping car business. The interested roads formed the Railroad Buying Group…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Helvering v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Corliss v. BowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Lewis v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Pinellas Ice & Cold Storage Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Reinecke v. SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Olaf C. Akland, and Bertha A. Akland v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Dynamics Corporation of America (Formerly Claude Neon, Inc.) v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- Edelman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
- Vaughn v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1983
- Hartland Assoc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1970
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.