Legal Opinion

Boyles v. Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1936PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

This is a personal injury action wherein the plaintiff obtained a verdict and judgment against defendants in the sum of $1,275.

Defendants assign error in the denial of their motion for new trial based upon: (1) Newly discovered evidence; and (2) alleged misconduct of counsel. Since the motion was filed too late to confer jurisdiction upon the circuit court to hear and determine the same (State v. Hecker, 109 Or. 520 (221 P. 808); 46 C. J. 295; 20 R. C. L. 302), we deem it inadvisable to encumber the reports with a recital of the contents of the affidavits in support of the motion. In the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. HeckerOregon Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. OlsenOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Oregon-Washington R. & Navigation Co. v. ReidOregon Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Nendel v. MeyersOregon Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API