Legal Opinion

Krein v. Heineman

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1987No. 86-422Published

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hunt

Mary Elizabeth Krein appeals the July 28, 1986, order and explanatory comment entered by the Seventh Judicial District Court granting defendant, Richard W. Heineman’s motion for summary judgment. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

Mary Elizabeth and Richard were married for four and one-half years prior to the May 4, 1981, decree dissolving the marriage. Richard is an attorney. Mary Elizabeth contends that at least seven attorneys refused to represent her in the divorce action because Richard was an attorney. From the record, it is unclear that all seven actually refused to represent her.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Meyer v. LemleyMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Morrison v. HigbeeMontana Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Kamp Implement Co. v. Amsterdam Lumber, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API