Legal Opinion

Caruso v. Baumle

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 2, 2001No. 5D00-2796PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

776 So.2d 371 (2001)

Helen M. CARUSO, etc., et al., Petitioners,

v.

Earl BAUMLE, Respondent.

No. 5D00-2796.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

February 2, 2001.

Donald Paul McCaskill and Jeffrey M. Byrd, Orlando, for Petitioners.

Lourdes Calvo-Paquette of Law Offices of Robert Soifer, Orlando, and Elizabeth C. Wheeler of Wheeler & Wilkinson, LLP, Orlando, for Respondent.

PLEUS, J.

By petition for writ of mandamus, the petitioners seek to quash an order denying a motion for entry of a final judgment in accordance with the verdict.

Following a jury trial in an automobile accident case,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Quintana v. BaradDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  2. Alexander v. City of Coral GablesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  3. Allstate Ins. Co. v. ScottDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  4. Walker v. WalkerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Caruso v. BaumleSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
  2. Wuesthoff Mem. Hosp., Inc. v. Fla. Elections Com'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  3. D.W.H. v. Department of Children & FamiliesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  4. Seminole Entertainment, Inc. v. City of CasselberryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API