Legal Opinion

Grigsby v. Department of Energy

Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals

Decided May 2, 1978No. 5-28PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

INGRAHAM, Judge.

The Federal Energy Administration (FEA) instituted this action against Jack W. Grigsby, an independent oil operator, following FEA audits on two of Grigsby’s properties. The ensuing Notice of Probable Violation (NOPV) accused Grigsby of charging prices for crude oil produced from these two properties in excess of the limits set by the Emergency Petroleum Allocation Act of 1975 (Act) and its implementing regulations. The NOPV ripened into a remedial order. Grigsby sued in United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana for review of the FEA action and for…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Pasco, Inc. v. Federal Energy AdministrationTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Cities Service Co. v. Federal Energy AdministrationTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. United States v. Exxon Corp.Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Mobil Oil Corp. v. Department of EnergyTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Sauder v. Department of EnergyTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. United States v. Exxon Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1983
  5. Pennzoil Co. v. United States Department of EnergyTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1982

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API