Legal Opinion
CP National Corp v. Bonneville Power Administration
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 26, 1991No. Nos. 89-70262, 90-70029PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judge:
CP National applied to the Bonneville Power Administration (“BPA”) for an increase in its average system cost (“ASC”). BPA determined that, pursuant to the 1984 average system cost methodology (“ASC methodology”), CP National was not entitled to an increase because the Oregon Public Utilities Commission (“OPUC”) had not determined the costs in question to be reasonable for ratemaking purposes. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) affirmed the BPA determination. CP National appeals this rate determination.
CP National presents three arguments urging…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Shields v. BarrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- Blum v. BaconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Northrop Corp. v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Niles-Bement-Pond Co. v. Iron Moulders Union Local No. 68Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Northern Shipping Funds I, L.L.C. v. Icon Capital Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Cp National Corporation, a California Corporation v. Bonneville Power Administration, Cp National Corporation, a California Corporation v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991