Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Sacramento County Department of Health & Human Services v. Tammi G.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 27, 2012No. C069365PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BUTZ, J.

Tammi G., the paternal grandmother and de facto parent of minors Michael A. and Austin A., appeals from an order removing the minors *663from her custody. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 387.)1 Appellant contends (1) the order must be reversed because of failures to comply with the inquiry and notice provisions of the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (ICWA) (25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq.) and (2) the order improperly delegated to respondent Sacramento County Department of Health and Human Services (the Department) complete discretion to decide whether appellant would receive visitation with the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Suk Yong Kim v. Sumitomo BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  2. Amato v. Mercury Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. Sacramento County Welfare Department v. Roy E.California Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. San Diego County Health & Human Services Agency v. Ray M.California Court of Appeal · 2004

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. San Diego Unified Port Dist. v. Cal. Coastal Comm'n, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. Mendocino Cnty. Health & Human Servs. Agency v. J.R. (In re E.R.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  3. San Diego Unified Port Dist. v. Cal. Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API