Legal Opinion

Negim & Co. v. Harp

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 8, 1924No. 13415PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ESTES, C.

Defendants in error sued plaintiff in error. Parties will be referred to as they thus appeared in the trial court. Plaintiffs allege that they were practicing attorneys; that defendant was a mercantile corporation doing business at PiCher, Okla.; that at the special request of Mrs. Mittie Negim, who was then in charge of said business, plaintiffs rendered legal services for defendant in and about the matter of a threatened receivership proceeding against defendant; that they effected a compromise agreement with the creditors of defendant, and rendered other services ; that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jack v. National BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
  2. Sapulpa Co. v. State Ex Rel. LankfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McKevitt v. Golden Age Breweries, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API