Commonwealth v. Herron
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1DissentManderino, Justice
I dissent. An accused must “. . .be provided with an adequate opportunity to present his version of the incident to the trier of fact.” Commonwealth v. Digiacomo, 463 Pa. 449, 452, 345 A.2d 605, 606 (1975). To protect this right, we have required the prosecution to advise the defendant of the identity and whereabouts of all known eyewitnesses, and to make those witnesses available to the defense if possible. Commonwealth v. Walak, 471 Pa. 457, 370 A.2d 695 (1977); Commonwealth v. Digiacomo, supra; Commonwealth v. Jones, 452 Pa. 569, 308 A.2d 598 (1973). The prosecution argues, however, that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Commonwealth v. CarterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Sorrentino v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
- Narberto Angelo Portomene v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- Commonwealth v. DiGiacomoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.