Legal Opinion
Wyoming v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 22, 2017No. 14-9512 and 14-9514PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TYMKOVICH, Chief Judge.
This case requires us to determine whether Congress diminished the boundaries of the Wind River Reservation in Wyoming in 1905. We find that it did.
The Eastern Shoshone and Northern Arapaho Tribes jointly inhabit the Wind River Reservation. The State of Wyoming and the Wyoming Farm Bureau Federation challenge a decision by the Environmental Protection Agency granting the Tribes’ application for joint authority to administer certain non-regulatory programs under the Clean Air Act on the Reservation. As part of their application for administrative authority, the Tribes…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- DeCoteau v. District County Court for the Tenth Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Lone Wolf v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Solem v. BartlettSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Murphy v. RoyalCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Murphy v. RoyalCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Montgomery v. SaulDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
- Murphy v. RoyalCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Virginia Werth v. United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of ColoradoBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2017