Legal Opinion

State v. . Whaley

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 17, 1926PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stacy, C. J.,

after stating tbe ease: Tbe case on appeal was settled by agreement and not by tbe judge; it contains several exceptions wbicb seem to necessitate a new trial.

There is ample evidence on behalf of tbe State to warrant a conviction, but tbe defendant has a different view of tbe matter, and be contends that tbe judge’s'instructions fail to give him tbe full benefit of bis testimony. Tbe following portion of tbe charge forms tbe basis of one of tbe defendant’s exceptive assignments of error:

“Tbe court further charges you that tbe defendant would be guilty, if you find from tbe…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. . RountreeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  2. State v. . SudderthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  3. State v. . GraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  4. State v. GoetzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
  5. State v. . TankersleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. . CopeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  2. State v. EasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. Duren v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  4. Williams v. Eastern Carolina Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  5. State v. WestonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API