Legal Opinion

Daniels v. Verizon Wireless

District Court, N.D. California

Decided September 23, 2025No. 3:25-cv-06720Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 BRANDON DANIELS, Case No. 25-cv-06720-SI 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION 9 v. TO PROCEED IFP, DENYING MOTION FOR TRO, AND SCREENING 10 VERIZON WIRELESS, COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO

28 U.S.C. § 1915

11 Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 5, 8 12 13 14 On August 8, 2025, plaintiff “Daniels, Brandon-Q, agent for BRANDON DANIELS” filed 15 the initial complaint in this action, a motion for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”), and an 16 application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), or without prepaying the Court filing fee.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
Simon v. Hartford Life, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
Adam v. SaengerSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
Cynthia Ketchum v. County of Alameda Alameda County Board of Supervisors Sheriff Glenn Dyer and Chief Ron CainCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.