Legal Opinion

Richau v. Rayner

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 7, 1999No. 17329-1-III, 17739-4-III, 18038-7-IIIPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchultheis, C.J.

These appeals stem from property owners Chris and Wilma Richau’s 1996 action to reform their deed to reflect the location of a boundary line as indicated to them by the sellers, Peter and M. Linda Rayner, prior to purchase. The Richaus’ action grew with the addition of disputes between the owners of the adjacent property, Michael and Sharon Page, and the Rayners. The first appeal and cross appeal raise real property questions, as well as issues relating to slander of title and whether damages are available for the wrongful filing of a lis pendens. The other two appeals concern the superior…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Puget Sound Plywood, Inc. v. MesterWashington Supreme Court · 1975

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Keystone Land & Development Company, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Xerox Corporation, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. South Kitsap Family Worship Center v. WeirCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  3. SOUTH KITSAP FAMILY WORSHIP CENTER v. WeirCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  4. Udall v. T.D. Escrow Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  5. Douglas v. HillCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API