Dunning v. Northwestern Electric Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion
On Petition eor Rehearing
Before Lusk, Chief Justice, and Brand, Belt, Ross-man and Bailey, Justices.
Reversed.
ROSSMAN, J.
The petition for a rehearing contends:
1. “The majority opinion was in error in holding that the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur applies in this case.”
2. “The Court erred in holding that there is substantial testimony supporting the jury’s findings as to the manner in which plaintiff’s accident occurred.”
3. “The Court erred in holding that the trial court did not err in denying defendant’s motion for a directed verdict; and, after verdict, in denying defendant’s motion for a…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Sweeney v. ErvingSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Galbraith v. BuschNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Engstrom v. Auburn Automobile Sales Corp.California Supreme Court · 1938
- Judson v. Bee Hive Auto Service Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1930
- Maupin v. SolomonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.