Legal Opinion

MacLachlan v. Pease

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 30, 1896PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Replevin.—Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Prank Baker, Judge, presiding; Heal'd in this court at the October term, 1896.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gary

April 9, 1895, the appellant commenced an action of replevin against the appellee and Axel Chytraus.

The latter was probably no proper party to the suit, which, we infer, was to take goods and chattels levied upon by the appellee as sheriff, under an execution in a cause in which Chytraus was plaintiff. Richardson v. Cassidy, 63 Ill. App. 482.

After several pleas by both the then defendants, the appellant filed a new declaration against the appellee alone, to which he alone filed ten new pleas. The suit was thereby discontinued as to Chytraus, and Pease became sole and only defendant. Black v.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Barnard v. BarnardIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Dilworth v. CurtsIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  3. McClure v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Black v. WomerIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Underwood v. WhiteIllinois Supreme Court · 1867

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. International Harvester Credit Corp. v. HellandAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  2. Zukowski v. ArmourAppellate Court of Illinois · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API