Brown v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
SHIVERS, Judge.
Appellant, Hayman Brown, appeals his convictions of sexual battery with great force and burglary of a dwelling with assault and the sentences imposed thereon. Brown’s court-appointed counsel has filed a brief, stating that she is unable to make a good faith argument that reversible error occurred in the trial court, in accordance with the procedure set forth in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967). Brown has failed to avail himself of leave granted to file a brief pro se. Our review, therefore, is based upon the allegations of error asserted…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- McArthur v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
- Harmon v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
- Goree v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Adams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Heath v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- Sapp v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Weaver v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985