Legal Opinion

Miller v. Hennepin County Medical Society

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 16, 1914No. Nos. 18,258—(135)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action in the district court for Hennepin county against Hennepin County Medical Society, IT. H. Kimball, as its president, E. J. Huenekens, as its secretary, and the members of its board of censors to restrain defendants from proceeding with and trying plaintiff upon a charge of having performed an abortion. Plaintiff obtained an order requiring defendants to show cause why a restraining order should not be granted.

Read the full summary

Action in the district court for Hennepin county against Hennepin County Medical Society, IT. H. Kimball, as its president, E. J. Huenekens, as its secretary, and the members of its board of censors to restrain defendants from proceeding with and trying plaintiff upon a charge of having performed an abortion. Plaintiff obtained an order requiring defendants to show cause why a restraining order should not be granted. The matter was heard before Dickinson, J., who denied plaintiff’s application. Erom the order denying the application, plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

Dibell, O.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff from an order of the district court of-Hennepin county granting in part and refusing in part his application for an injunction restraining the defendants from trying him for certain acts which had been involved in a criminal prosecution against him.

The defendant Hennepin County Medical Society is a voluntary association of physicians and surgeons. The other defendants are members and officers of it. The plaintiff is a member. The society has been in existence since 1859. Membership in it is highly prized and is the source of professional honor and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In the Matter of ____, an AttorneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Munk v. FrinkNebraska Supreme Court · 1908
  3. In re SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1833
  4. People ex rel. Colorado Bar Ass'n v. WebberSupreme Court of Colorado · 1899
  5. People ex rel. Colo. Bar Ass'n v. ClintonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1902

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Application for Discipline of HeinzeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  2. In Re Reinstatement of ReutterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  3. Falcone v. Middlesex Co. Medical Soc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API