Legal Opinion

Pago Petroleum Products, Inc. v. Ye Ahn Moolsoan, Ltd.

High Court of American Samoa

Decided October 2, 1995No. CA No. 70-93Published

1Opinion of the Court

BACKGROUND

At issue in this case is the question of who will pay the bill for products purchased from plaintiff Pago Petroleum Products, Inc. ("PPP") by defendant Ye Ahn Moolsoan, Ltd. ("YAM").

The following facts are undisputed. Defendant Ralph Tuia ("Tuia") and YAM, represented by Kyu Won Kim ("Kim"), formulated together some type of unincorporated business association, known as Polynesian Trading Company ("PTC"). PTC encountered various business *35difficulties, and eventually folded.1 As the business was experiencing problems, Kim left American Samoa and has not been present in the Territory…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Curry v. US, Small Business Admin.District Court, N.D. California · 1987
  2. Carmichael v. RiceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Motor Dispatch, Inc. v. BuggieIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. United States v. RichDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API