Legal Opinion
Mark v. Board of Higher Education
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 11, 1951PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtFroessel, J.
This declaratory judgment action involves the construction of the “ transfer clause ” of former section 889, subdivision b, of the Education Law (L. 1943, ch. 403, known as the Moffat Law), which, with later amendments not here relevant, is now section 3104 of the Education Law. That section, as effective April 8, 1943, so far as here pertinent, provided: “In any public institution of higher learning under the jurisdiction of the board of higher education of a city having a population of one million or more, the salaries and salary increments of the following positions of the teaching and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Harman v. Board of Educ. of City of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Nelson v. The Board of Higher EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- Nelson v. Board of Higher EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Matter of Putnam v. MarshallNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Leighton v. BearmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mark v. BD. OF HIGHER EDUC. OF CITY OF NYNew York Court of Appeals · 1951