Legal Opinion

Fountain v. Atlanta Casualty Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 28, 1991No. A91A0353PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cooper, Judge.

Appellee issued an insurance policy to appellants, Stanley and Marsha Fountain, containing a named driver exclusion agreement, which provided that all coverages except personal injury protection (“PIP”) were not afforded by the policy if any vehicle was being used, driven, operated, manipulated by or under the care, custody, or control of Cynthia R. Fountain, the 16-year-old daughter of Stanley and Marsha Fountain. The appellants also rejected in writing all uninsured motorist coverage if the vehicle were operated by the excluded driver in the policy. While the policy was in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mayor of Athens v. GerdineSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  2. Sentry Insurance v. MajeedCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  3. Sentry Insurance v. MajeedSupreme Court of Georgia · 1990
  4. Chastain v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1989

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Atlanta Casualty Co. v. FountainSupreme Court of Georgia · 1992
  2. Fountain v. Atlanta Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  3. Roberson v. 21st Century National InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  4. Danny Roberson v. 21st Century National Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API