Atlanta Casualty Co. v. Fountain
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Clarke, Chief Justice.
We granted certiorari to consider whether the Atlanta Casualty Company should have been allowed to pursue an action for declaratory judgment under the circumstances of this case. We conclude that it should have, and therefore reverse.
Stanley and Marsha Fountain bought automobile insurance from Atlanta Casualty Company. They agreed to a “named driver exclusion” which excluded their 16-year-old daughter, Cynthia Fountain, from any coverage except personal injury protection. They also rejected in writing “all uninsured motorist coverage if the vehicle is being driven by the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mayor of Athens v. GerdineSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Darnell v. TateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- City of Nashville v. SnowSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
- Sentry Insurance v. MajeedSupreme Court of Georgia · 1990
- Chastain v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Baker v. City of MariettaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
- Adkins Energy, LLC v. Delta-T Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004
- Morgan v. Guaranty National CompaniesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
- Pinnacle Benning, LLC v. Clark Realty Capital, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1994
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.