Legal Opinion · Dissent

Carol Wojciechowicz v. United States

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided September 9, 2009No. 08-2454Published

1DissentLipez, Circuit Judge

There is no question that the pilot bears primary responsibility for the tragic accident at issue here. Nevertheless, that is only part of the story. This case raises important questions about the scope of an air traffic controller’s duty of care to a plane flown under visual flight rules *72(“VFR”) after radar contact initiated by the pilot is then lost. The majority accepts the district court’s finding that any possible breach of duty by the controller did not contribute to the crash. I do not agree. If a controller’s duty to separate aircraft from terrain continues after radar contact is…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. Wong Kim Bo, A/K/A Yee Kuk Ho, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  3. Nieves-Villanueva v. Soto-RiveraCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  4. Trenkler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
  5. In re N-500L CasesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API