Legal Opinion

Baker v. Johnson & Johnson

District Court, S.D. Illinois

Decided May 26, 2010No. Civil 10-283-GPMPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MURPHY, District Judge:

I. Introduction

This case, which comes to the Court via removal from state court, is before the Court sua sponte on the issue of federal subject matter jurisdiction. See Johnson v. Wattenbarger, 361 F.3d 991, 992 (7th Cir.2004) (a district court’s “first duty in every suit” is “to determine the existence of subject-matter jurisdiction”); Asperger v. Shop Vac Corp., 524 F.Supp.2d 1088, 1091 (S.D.Ill.2007) (quoting Hay v. Indiana State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs, 312 F.3d 876, 879 (7th Cir.2002)) (reviewing sua sponte the allegations of federal subject matter…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Hertz Corp. v. FriendSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson Ex Rel. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Caterpillar Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Reeves v. Pfizer, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2012
  2. Walsh Chiropractic, Ltd. v. StrataCare, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2010
  3. Livingston v. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
  4. Feeley v. Bayer Corp.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
  5. Livingston v. Hoffmann-La Roche, IncDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API