Legal Opinion

Adams v. Arkansas Department of Health & Human Services

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 22, 2009No. 08-806PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAUL E. DANIELSON, Justice.

The instant case is a no-merit appeal from an order of long-term protective custody filed by counsel for appellant Rufus Homer Adams. The order awarded long-term custody of Mr. Adams to appellee Arkansas Department of Health and Human Services (DHS). Mr. Adams’s brief presents this court with an issue of first impression, that is, whether a court-appointed attorney for an alleged endangered, indigent adult can file an Anders no-merit appeal from an order of long-term custody in an adult-protective case. Assuming that an Anders no-merit appeal is possible, counsel…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Linker-Flores v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  3. Buchte v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  4. Dickinson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  5. Campbell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1995

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sartin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
  2. Doran v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2014
  3. Howard v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2017
  4. Nicholson v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2017
  5. Johnston v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API