Legal Opinion

In re Polk

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided September 25, 2015No. 2015-B-1408Published

1Per curiam

_JjThis disciplinary matter arises from formal charges filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) against respondent, William Paul Polk, II, an attorney licensed to practice law in Louisiana, but currently ineligible to practice.

UNDERLYING FACTS

In June 2010, Arthur Brogna hired respondent to handle his father’s succession. Respondent estimated the total costs for the representation would be $1,500 and requested an advance deposit of $700, which Mr. Brogna paid.

On September 10, 2010, respondent was declared ineligible to practice law for failure to pay his bar dues and the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
  2. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. ReisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  3. In Re CaulfieldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
  4. In Re PardueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  5. In Re BanksSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API