Legal Opinion

Copp v. Modern Key Shop, Inc.

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided January 27, 1995PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFurnari, J.

This is the second report to this Division of this action in contract to recover a balance owed to the plaintiff’s testator on a promissory note executed by the defendant.

On the first appeal by the plaintiff, we vacated a judgment for defendant Modern Key Shop, Inc. on the basis of the insufficiency of the evidence reported from the first trial to sustain the court’s finding that the defendant’s satisfaction of the note was excused on the grounds of frustration of purpose. Copp v. Hague, 1994 Mass. App. Div. 11.

After a second trial on the merits, judgment was entered for the plaintiff in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chase Precast v. JOHN J. PAONESSA CO., COMMONWEALTHMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Copp v. HagueMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1994
  3. Iodice v. Bradco Cleaners, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1993

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Saab v. Norton Family, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API