Legal Opinion

Krause v. Spurgeon

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 6, 1927PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBradley, J.

This is a suit on a promissory note. Plaintiff recovered judgment and defendant appealed.

The defense relied upon was payment and the Statute of Limitations. The trial was had before a jury, but the jury failed to agree. Thereafter it was agreed that the record as made at the trial be submitted to the court sitting as a jury. This was done and the court found for plaintiffs. This is the second time this cause has reached this court, [See Krause et al. v. Spurgeon, 256 S. W. 1072.] We make reference to our former opinion for the facts underlying this canse, and will state in the course of this…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Moore v. HutchinsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1879
  2. Compton v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1882
  3. Revelle v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1881
  4. Meyers v. BoydMissouri Court of Appeals · 1889
  5. Simon v. RyanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. E. R. Redmond D/B/A Arcola Food Market v. United States of America and United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  2. Spano v. Western Fruit Growers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
  3. Hiscock v. HiscockMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Cooper's Home Furnishings, Inc. v. SmithSuperior Court of Delaware · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API