Legal Opinion

Chickasha Cotton Oil Co. v. Cotton County Gin Co.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 28, 1930No. 177PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COTTERAL, Circuit Judge.

The Chickasha Cotton Oil Company, a Delaware corporation, owning and operating a cotton gin at Walters, OH., appeals from the dismissal of a suit to enjoin the Cotton County Gin Company, chartered under the OHahoma law, from constructing and operating a gin at the same city.

The grounds of suit as alleged in plaintiff’s bill are in substance, and so far as they are material, that it is operating the gin as a needed utility under a license granted by the State Corporation- Commission, pursuant to article 4, chapter 20, Comp. Okl. Stat. 1921, as amended by Chapter 191,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Frost v. Corporation Comm'n of Okla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
  3. Tyson & Brother v. BantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. Chas. Wolff Packing Co. v. Court of Industrial RelationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. Williams v. Standard Oil Co. of La.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hooks v. Comptroller of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  2. Community Public Service Co. v. New Mexico Public Service CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Farmers' Gin Co. v. HayesDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1943
  4. Davies Warehouse Co. v. BrownEmergency Court of Appeals · 1943
  5. Farmers' Gin Co. v. HayesDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API