Legal Opinion · Dissent

Great Northern Railway Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 20, 1967No. 247-62Published

1DissentDureee, Judge

(See dissent following the conclusion of the commissioner’s opinion.)

OPINION OE COMMISSIONER*

Stone, Commissioner:

Plaintiff seeks in this action to recover freight charges involving one shipment of explosive projectiles and 48 shipments of propelling charges for 120-mm antiaircraft guns, without projectiles, which moved over plaintiff’s lines and the lines of other carriers between *229various points within the United States during the years 1944 and 1945.

After the shipments had been completed, plaintiff, as the final and delivering carrier, billed the transportation charges to defendant who paid…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Aero Mayflower Transit Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  2. Southern Pac. Co. v. LothropCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
  3. Union Pacific R. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950
  4. Union Pacific Railroad v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
  5. Union Pacific Railroad Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API