Legal Opinion
Gura v. Herman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 31, 1929PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKapper, J.
Plaintiff, a manufacturing jeweler, received an order from Edgar Guggenheim, defendants’ testator, in the early part of February, 1928, to manufacture a diamond bracelet, the agreed price of which was $7,015. The bracelet was duly manufactured, but just prior to its delivery on March 5, 1928, to Rye Guggenheim, the testator’s wife, Mr. Guggenheim died, his death occurring on March 3, 1928. The action is for the agreed price of the manufactured jewel.
It was stipulated that the order given by the decedent to plaintiff for this bracelet was an oral one, and that it was given at decedent’s home,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kernochan v. . MurrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Lamport v. . SmedleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
- Chamberlain v. . DunlopNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Oatman v. WatrousAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
3Cited by8 opinions
- Esquire Radio & Electronics, Inc. v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Posner v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1962
- Tradeways Incorporated, Plaintiff-Appellee-Appellant v. Chrysler Corporation, Defendant-Appellant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- Mathews v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1964
- Di Scipio v. SullivanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.