Lipkowitz & Plaut v. Affrunti
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Shanley N. Egeth, J.
Plaintiff commenced each of these separate actions to recover the sum of $55,260, plus interest from November 19, 1976, from the defendant in each action.
The facts and issues in each action are identical. When the actions were reached for trial without jury before me, I sua sponte combined the cases for a single trial and joint disposition, with the consent of all parties.
In each action the plaintiff attorneys seek the accelerated *851balance plus accrued interest, claimed to be due from the respective defendants pursuant to certain promissory notes. The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Williams v. . IngersollNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Bank of America v. . WaydellNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
- Porter v. Lane Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
- Blake v. WeidenNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- Farmers' Reliance Mutual Insurance v. Lane Constuction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Wachta v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- Bremen Bank & Trust Co. of St. Louis v. MuskopfMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
- Hauser v. Western Group Nurseries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- All American Finance Co. v. Pugh Shows, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
- Bavelis v. Doukas (In re Bavelis)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.